misinterpretation of an IDEA, the wrong one.

mangkuk tandas

invention awal hanyalah lubang di tanah sedalam . . . ikut kecairan bahan buangan, lg cair mean lg dalam. (done)

then a closed rooms with holes on the floor, this was most practical type at bankside of a river. no need to flush meyh, all automatic. (done)

idea awal ni nak kata, basic pose tuk hajat besar ni adalah mencangkung. tp sekarang mana plak datang nyer idea mangkuk tandas duduk ni???

always look on the bright side, kater la orang ni kaki dia sakit . xleh nak bengkok habis, depa membuang dalam keadaan duduk ler. then to help them, they use a seat with big holes in the centre. so jadilah mangkuk tandas. but does people nowadays realized that it was meant for an O.K.U? kurang upaya nak mencangkung maksudnyer.

when the business minded people get the invention idea, marketing mulalah bagai nak rak advertise better invention kate nyer. kalau tengok cost_wise between tandas duduk ngan cangkung ni, jauh lagi mahal yang duduk.

Things that's more expensive supposed to be more beneficial, practical and by comparing these two type, the hygienic aspect favors yg mencangkung. Bacterias, germs and whatsoever bad things yg ada kat toilet seat tu wouldn't get to us (i presume) when there's no skin contact, isn't?

Plus I do think squatting eased the waste off better. and easier to istinjak too...